Some of that comes down to the preparation of the undergraduates who enroll. To do so, they would need to consider not just income, but also wealth, family structure and neighborhood poverty. It seems a bit insincere to argue that although these other factors are acceptable as part of the larger decision making process — including legacy admissions, which perpetuates class inequality — race is not. The Pros and Cons of Affirmative Action — Essay Sample Affirmative action was originally conceived to support equality amongst different nationalities, races, sexes and other individualizing groups. And they deserve to get access too.
Affirmative action gives preferential treatment based exclusively on race, which is a purely external characteristic. It is a set of procedures intended to eliminate the discrimination of an applicant based on their ethnic origin. By reserving seats exclusively for minorities the definition of a quota mean that you are unequally applying decisions to a group of people. Unintended consequences 1: affirmative action engenders resentment in non-minorities, usually mistakenly. Moreover, there is a growing sense that if affirmative action has not succeeded in ending discrimination after 25 years of determined implementation, then perhaps it is time to try something else. As someone who has both seen and participated in affirmative action programs, I see two unintended consequences of such programs. Since people still can't get past their feelings of resentment, how can we attain a society that treats everyone equally? If 1% of your applicants are minorities, then logic would suggest that in a fair system, you would have 1% minority population.
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case — Fisher v. I'm fairly sure that i got in, at least in part, because of my disability. Arguments For and Against Affirmative Action. Affirmative action also has not eradicated discrimination; racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination still exist today. This argument supports the idea of solely class-based affirmative action. Affirmative action, when used as a factor in college admissions, is meant to foster diversity and provide equal opportunities in education for underrepresented minorities. Broken and burning and minus 620,000 men, a new challenge lay before the nation: social equality.
I went as a 3rd year, which is difficult to get into. Other states are considering similar legislation. This is since the emergence of affirmative action led to social awareness within the society and also led to institution of anti-discrimination laws which made race be of less concern compared to social class. Supreme in 2003, though the Court also upheld affirmative action as a in a court case held simultaneously that year. Students of color will be treated as undeserving. Malcolm, head of Education and Human Resources Programs at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, at a briefing on the case earlier this week hosted by the American Educational Research Association.
Sander, believe is happening in California. Affirmative Action is not actually that bad. So the question that separates whether one agrees or disagrees with affirmative action is whether this student does or doesn't deserve the oportunity to get into a school with quality education. Though its creation was meant to inspire freedom, opportunity and equality, does affirmative action truly achieve this goal? This makes the argument appear to be strong against affirmative action Martindale 1-2. What it does is perpetuates socioeconomic inequalities by making it easy for members of racial minorities from privileged backgrounds to get into prestigious colleges while not helping members of the lower classes. Park also served as a consulting expert in the case on the side of Harvard. We would prepare kids for life, instead of for standardized tests and college admissions.
The argument that affirmative action do not lead to true diversity sounds weak. The world don't give a damn about how sensitive these kids are, especially the black kids. During the Intelligence Squared debate last week, Roger Clegg, president and general counsel for the Center for Equal Opportunity, argued that a diverse campus and the interracial conversations that could result from it is not a compelling enough reason to continue racial preferences, even as part of a larger calculus that considers many factors for student admission. And it was not the side defending affirmative action. But simple discrimination seems to have become a relatively smaller obstacle over the last few decades, while socioeconomic disadvantage has become a larger one. It does not discriminate against Whites or wealthy people, it simply gives ithers the chance to.
But for those interested, they have remained a steady 6 percent overrepresented at top colleges. The idea you proposed that Whites somehow are paying the consequence for things their ancestors did is respectfully invalid. It is always good at times to use conventional qualification measurement other than criteria to create adequate distribution of resources and admissions. Lowering standards for under-represented groups raises the quality of the student body. Other opponents say that affirmative action lowers the bar, and so denies those who strive for excellence on their own merit and the sense of real achievement. But I'm the same mean cuss with everybody out there on that football field. Certainly, no one has accused Stanford's admissions officers of being racist, so perhaps the real problem with affirmative action is that we are pretending to solve a problem that no longer exists.
Some opponents further claim that affirmative action has undesirable side-effects and that it fails to achieve its. Had black and Latino students been benefiting from those preferences, as many would, at least some portion of affirmative action might be in less peril. Posted on 24 Jan Comments on this Article Have something to say? According to analysis this point of view presents one of the strongest arguments in support for affirmative action Martindale 1-2. Because the undeniable truth of the matter is that certain races happen to have different experiences that stem from the history of racism in this country. Much of affirmative action involves exterminating discrimination and including a certain amount of individuals from different ethnic groups, genders, cultures, etc. For example, a hard working student whose family is poor so lives in a low income neighborhood must attend a high school that does not get good funding since most people in that neighborhood are low income so their taxes aren't adequate to provide for a better education system. The school had a policy of rating potential applicants on a point system.
You are saying that it helps the poor contend with the rich. One of the big questions that follows from these dim findings is whether more minority students could get into selective colleges if they applied. The issue may at times result in additional stigmatization imposed on those who are considered beneficiaries of affirmative action programs. On the one hand, the Supreme Court has banned the use of strict quotas in universities. At jobs, people watched me closely, attributing my every mistake to my disability.
That question has hallmarked fiery debates from dinner tables all the way to the Supreme Court for more than a century. Racial quotas for public colleges were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of Bakke v. Many see it as a negative policy which gives an unnecessary advantage to minorities in America. He was chair of the National Competitiveness Committee for the National Venture Capital Association, was selected by President Obama to represent the United States at the U. The majority of Asian American advocacy organizations involved in public debates over race conscious affirmative action have attempts to revitalize the argument that Asian Americans are harmed by considering race as part of a holistic review. When people do start to suspect the worst -- that preferences have skewed the entire class -- they are accused of the very racism that justifies these preferences.